|Dmitrijs Bindemanis via Shutterstock|
One morning, I checked in on an 82-year-old female who was admitted overnight after falling in her home. She looked like any other elderly woman: gray hair, thin legs and arms, and wrinkled skin. Yet she lacked the frailty and exhaustion that sick older people often exhibit and wore a faint smirk — the angles of her lips curved upwards just enough to discern an optimistic disposition. As I knocked and entered she startled and pulled the covers up to her chin.
I asked the woman how she felt, if there was anything she needed and, in turn, she answered and asked me how I was doing. She seemed, in other words, to be skillfully participating in the sort of anodyne introductory conversation that people have when they first meet in such settings. But when I asked her if she knew where she was, she replied “no.” It turns out she had dementia, a slow and progressive deterioration of mental function, and could tell me almost nothing about life at home. In response to more detailed questions I only received a nod or a barely audible “yes.” Even when I kneeled close and raised my voice, assuming she was hard of hearing, I received similar responses. Disease had mangled her memory and her ability to socialize appropriately.
When we rounded, I presented her to the medical team and entered the room to examine and speak with her. Our attending physician asked the patient how she was feeling. Frustrated by her inability to answer my questions, the patient replied “sad” and exclaimed “I could really use a joke to lift my spirits!” It’s a request that we so rarely hear in a hospital; everyone wants food, or drink, or medicine, but few people request a joke. The attending asked me to tell the patient a good joke after rounds.
I’m not skilled at the art of joke-telling — it requires the appropriate joke at the appropriate time with the appropriate delivery. And this particular situation did not lend itself to a complex yarn with a long backstory. It needed to be simple. So I thought a knock-knock joke would do the trick; after all, everyone knows how knock-knock jokes work. Here’s the one I planned to use:
Knock, knock Who’s there? Rufus Rufus, who? Rufus the highest part of the house.
Granted, it is corny, but I was sure it would elicit a chuckle from an old lady with dementia. Then I told her the joke:
Me: Knock, knock Her: Knock, knock Me (jokingly): Who’s there? Her: Who’s there? Me (attempting to start over again): Knock, knock Her: Knock, knock
She wasn’t doing this playfully; she did it because she could not understand or remember how knock-knock jokes work. When we all got back to the physician workroom, I told the medical team about this encounter and we had a good laugh. Indeed, dementia is the theme of many jokes in medicine. Have you heard the one about the doctor and the Alzheimer’s patient?
“I’m sorry to tell you this but you have cancer,” the doctor told her patient. “I do?” “Yes, but that’s not all… you also have Alzheimer’s disease,” said the doctor. “I do?” “Yes,” nodded the physician. The patient beamed and said: “Oh well, at least I don’t have cancer.”
Or, maybe you’ve heard this other good joke about dementia:
The doctor tells his patient: “Well I have good news and bad news…” The patient says, “Lay it on me Doc. What’s the bad news?” “You have Alzheimer’s disease.” “Good heavens! What’s the good news?” “You can go home and forget about it!”
But what is so funny about these jokes? Aren’t we laughing about a debilitating disease that tears apart lives? In that room I entered was a woman who could not participate in a joke that even the youngest and simplest child could understand. Why is some part of this funny?
In another medical unit, we took care of an 80-year-old with metastatic cancer nearing the end of his life. He needed a breathing machine to pump air into his lungs and was being fed through a tube which connected his stomach to a container of liquid nutrients. He lay in bed without moving, occasionally blinking his eyes. Because he lay in bed all day he developed pressure ulcers. The pressure from an immobile person’s weight on the bed causes skin breakdown. This leads to serious and life-threatening infections as well as terrible pain. In order to slow the breakdown process, nurses constantly change the position of the immobile patient, rolling him or her every few hours and putting creams and ointments on the sores.
During rounds, I helped the nurses and the attending physician to examine the patient’s pressure sores. When we turned the patient, his hospital gown opened exposing his bare derrière. I bent down to look closely at his sacrum, an anatomical spot above his anal opening, which contained multiple ulcers. As I got close, the patient let out a huge fart. I almost burst out laughing but abruptly held myself back when I saw the attending physician, staid and focused on the ulcer. Why did I nearly laugh at flatulence from a patient who was so close to death that he could not control his bowels? Should I laugh at that?
Irreverent, dark, depressing, and, yes, immature humor pervades the medical profession. We all tell each other funny stories like these when we get together. I remember one resident telling me a knee-slapper about a demented patient throwing feces at her. It’s funny, in an upsetting way.
Multiple days a week, physicians witness some of the darkest moments that human beings experience in their lives: cancer diagnoses, death, alcoholism, drug overdoses, child abuse, neglect and abandonment, depression, horrific trauma, progressive physical and mental disease, stillbirths, strokes, and more. Humor is one of the ways physicians deal with this barrage of depressing encounters.
But why? Perhaps to understand this response in the relatively mild context of the hospital, we can examine the most extreme example of humor in the face of suffering — the Jewish experience before and during the Holocaust.
Ruth Wisse, the Martin Peretz Professor of Yiddish Literature and Professor of Comparative Literature at Harvard University, wrestles with the idea of tragic humor in No Joke, her wonderful 2013 book on Jewish humor. Professor Wisse notes that during tumultuous times, Jewish humor flourished because of “an increased need for entertainment that would distract or temporarily release the tension, and offer consolation.” One Jewish comedian in particular, Shimon Dzigan, exemplified this concept during the early twentieth century in Eastern Europe, playing characters on stage in sketches which poked fun at local Polish political figures and even German leaders. In explaining why he sought humor in dark times, Dzigan explained, “I have no answer. I can only say that perhaps because we subconsciously felt that our verdict was sealed and our fate unavoidable, we consciously wished to shout it down and drown it out. With effervescent joy we wanted to drive off the gnawing sadness, the dread and fear that nested deep inside us.” Indeed, there is a gaping chasm between how those who joke about serious matters actually feel and what they laugh about. The laughing isn’t merely a cover for their feelings but a way of making those feelings less unpleasant and less controlling. Wisse eloquently observes: “If cognitive dissonance is caused by a divergence between convictions and actuality, and if humor attempts to exploit that discomfort, no one was ever so perfectly placed to joke as were Jews under Hitler and Stalin.” Wisse also provides an entertaining example of a joke during the Holocaust:
Two acquaintances meet on the street. “It’s good to see you back,” says the first.
“I hear that conditions in the concentration camp are horrible.” “Not at all,” replies the second. “They wake us at 7:30. Breakfast with choice of coffee or cocoa is followed by sports or free time for reading. Then a plentiful lunch, rest period, games, a stroll, and conversation until dinner, the main meal of the day. This is followed by entertainment, usually a movie…”
The first man is incredulous. “Really! The lies they spread about the place! I recently ran into Klein, who told me horror stories.”
“That’s why he’s back there,” nods the second.
Doctors, to be sure, are not in a position that even closely resembles the position of Jews during the dark days of the twentieth century. But the humor that physicians use to deal with the things that they see is similar. There is a pit of Weltschmerz in medicine as well; a divergence between convictions and actuality. Most doctors enter medicine with a desire to help and to heal. But medicine necessarily deals with death and failure and all the emotions that come with them. To exploit and, at the same time, cloak that discomfort we resort to laughing at the actions of demented patients or inappropriately commenting about a patient’s impending death. Whether right or wrong, laughter transiently drives out the gnawing sadness, the dread, and the fear that, perhaps, one day we will be that patient.